A seized knife (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

On May 19, 201, the Defendant: (a) married on February 2, 1986 and divorced on May 19, 201 with the victim C (the age of 45) and the victim thought that the victim had been out of the past and continued to find the victim’s whereabouts after the divorce; (b) had the victim known that the victim would operate the Daejeon Seo-gu Dhop; (c) had the victim known that the victim would murder the victim. On February 14, 2012, the Defendant was seated with the victim from the “Dhop” above, and then the victim did not take the victim’s seat at the victim’s left knife with the victim’s left knife without having to use the knife,” but the victim was unable to take the victim’s knife with the victim’s knife at the right right knife with the victim’s knife’s knife.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. E prosecutorial statement;

1. An investigation report (in cases of attaching, such as a field photograph, etc., and attaching a certificate of diagnosis of injury), and an investigation report (in cases of dual judgment attached thereto);

1. Seizure records;

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion of addition of photographs on the part of the victim's body

1. The assertion;

A. Although it was true that knife the knife of the victim as stated in the judgment of denying the intention of murder, there was no idea of murdering the victim;

(B) there is no fact that the knife is prepared in advance and there is no knowledge of how the knife is possessed in the influence of alcohol).