However, with respect to the defendant A, B, and D, it shall be for three years from the date of each judgment.

Defendant

A had the record of being notified of KRW 300,000 as a charge of the acquisition of stolen goods by the Busan District Court on May 8, 2012. Defendant B was sentenced to a fine of KRW 15 million by the same court on April 10, 2012. Defendant C had the record of being sentenced to a fine of KRW 15 million by the same court on April 10, 2012. Defendant C had the record of being sentenced to a fine of KRW 15 million by the same court on April 10, 2012. On July 22, 2010, it was sentenced to a suspension of the execution of imprisonment of KRW 3 years with labor for robbery from the Busan District Court’s Branch Branch for the crime of robbery and for the period of grace. Defendant D has the record of being notified of KRW 7 million as a charge of the acquisition of stolen goods from the Busan District Court on May 8, 2012.

1. On October 2012, Defendant A purchased a lost mobile device that he/she acquired with a taxi engineer, etc. before the long-term convenience store in the Seocho-gu Office of Daegu, Daegu, as well as B, C, and G, and sold it to the purchaser of the stolen mobile device. C prepared the purchase fund for the mobile phone and purchased the mobile phone device from a taxi engineer, etc., and attached profits to the mobile phone that he/she purchased, and the Defendant, B, and G shared the role of purchasing the lost mobile phone device from the taxi engineer.

Thus, from October 22, 2012 to October 22, 2012, the Defendant, in collusion with B, C, and G, acquired the stolen goods in collusion with B, etc. by purchasing a cell phone device at nine times as shown in the annexed crime list (1) by November 9, 2012, in collusion with the victim, from two taxi engineers on the roads near the upstream road in the Sungwon-gu, Seowon-si, Seowon-si, Seowon-si, the victim’s name-in partner lost in the taxi, etc., with the knowledge that he was a stolen goods.

2. Defendant B: (a) on October 2012, 201, the Defendant was in the middle-term Dong-dong, Seogu, Daegu; and (b) on the part of the Defendant, prior to the mutual incom