A. (1) Defendant B and C are jointly and severally 2,081,815 won, and 2) Defendant G are jointly and severally described in the foregoing paragraph 1 with Defendant C.

A. International Credit Union was established on April 2, 1981 pursuant to the Credit Unions Act, and was merged into the Plaintiff on September 4, 2014.

(B) Defendant B served as the president of the Plaintiff’s non-standing service from February 22, 2006 to August 27, 2014; Defendant C as the head of the Plaintiff’s division from January 2, 2001 to August 31, 2014; Defendant D as the head of the Plaintiff’s division from March 21, 2005 to July 25, 2014; Defendant E as the Plaintiff’s representative from January 26, 2005 to November 30, 2009 to November 30, 201, and Defendant F as the Plaintiff’s clerk from September 1, 2010 to March 31, 2013.

Of the Plaintiff’s credit regulations and credit business methods, the parts related to this case shall be as shown in the attached Form.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, 2, Gap evidence 3, 4, 5, 23, 27, 29, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. 1) The chief executive officer, etc. of a credit union in the relevant legal doctrine on the cause of a claim shall comply with the Credit Unions Act, orders issued under the above Act, the articles of association, the regulations of the general assembly, and the resolution of the board of directors, and perform his/her duties in good faith for the union. The executive officer shall be jointly and severally liable for damages inflicted upon the union or any other person by intention or gross negligence (in cases of a standing executive, intentionally or negligently)

(Article 33(1) and (2) of the Credit Unions Act. Accordingly, if the Plaintiff’s non-standing executive officers knew or took full care of the fact that the pertinent operations were illegal or unjust in the performance of all the operations of the union, they could have known that they were illegal or unjust by means of account books, loan-related documents, etc. of the union, but if there was gross negligence in neglecting their duties by significantly neglecting such duties, they shall be liable for damages due to nonperformance of delegation agreements to the