However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 13, 2016, the Defendant d (the age of 26) who d (the age of 26) d(s) who d(s) d(s) that d(s) d(s) that d (the age of 26) d(s) d(s) d (the age of c), while drinking together with Defendant d(C) at the Sin-Eup-Eup’s house located in Dong-dong, where the Defendant d(C) d) dice

“On the ground that he/she was a farmer, he/she sawd a dangerous beer’s disease on the table, and threatened the victim on the ground that he/she was frightencing, as he/she was frighting to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the consideration of favorable circumstances, such as the reflection of errors and the extent of damage, etc.);

1. Surveillance of protection, Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the main sentence of Article 59 (1) of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of Social Service Orders;