The court below's punishment (one hundred months of imprisonment, confiscation) against the defendant is too unreasonable.

Judgment

It is reasonable to take into account that the defendant's mistake is divided in depth. However, the defendant's previous convictions are four times (two times of actual punishment, two times of suspended execution), and the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victims, or did not pay damages to the victims, except that part of the damaged goods have been temporarily restored, and taking into account the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc., and all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.