If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On September 20, 2012, from around 01:00 to around 01:30 of the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force on the part of the victim’s restaurant operated by the victim D in Busan metropolitan traffic Daegu, on the ground that the victim changed the drinking value. The victim was holding the small bottle on the floor, and the victim was carrying the small bottled on the floor. On the side, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by leaving the food from the restaurant to the restaurant.

2. The defrauded ordered the following: (a) the Defendant, at the same time and place as referred to in the preceding paragraph, issued an order, such as the owner of the lawsuit, the flag, etc.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the drinking value.

In the end, the Defendant deceiving the victim as above, and acquired the victim 2 disease, which is the total market value of 15,000 won, from the victim, and 3 man-made share, etc., and acquired them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant fraud of criminal facts: Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act: Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.