폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.
Punishment of the crime
1. On June 9, 2018, at around 03:50, Defendant A’s property damage: (a) the first apartment complex of the cultural main apartment complex located in the 55-ro, 161-ro, Seogu, Seogu, Seogu, Seogu, Daejeon, in front of the apartment site; and (b) the victim D, who is a taxi engineer, wanting to get a taxi and want to get a taxi, and (c) “I are waiting for another taxi, and I are waiting for another taxi; (d) I want to take a bath for the victim; (e) the victim’s driver’s seat and the chief glass hold of E-si, the victim owned, as drinking, and (e) there is no evidence to acknowledge repair costs of KRW 64,578,4,578, as stated in the indictment, in which the amount of the taxi owned by the victim could be available.
The repair cost was damaged.
2. Defendant A violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) on June 9, 2018, around 03:50, Defendant A destroyed the victim D(58 tax) vehicle in front of the apartment site of culture located in 55-gil-ro, 161, Seogu, Seogu, Seogu, Seogu, Daejeon, and caused damage to the victim’s face one time due to the victim’s destruction of the vehicle in front of the apartment site of culture located in 161, and caused damage to the victim’s head for about 14 days.
Accordingly, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim.
3. On June 9, 2018, around 04:05, the Defendant interfered with Defendant B’s performance of official duties, on the front of the apartment site of a cultural apartment complex of 55, a 161-gil-ro, Seogu, Seogu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, on the front of the apartment site of 161, and on the front of the Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, upon receiving a report of 112, “If the police is the police, the police would immediately
"Fely, I knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee of the above G.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each police statement made to D or G;
1. Each statement of D and H.