2. The court below did not have any record of recognizing the defendant's mistake and against it. Although there was no record of committing the crime identical to the crime of this case, all these circumstances are considered in the court below. The amount of the occupational embezzlement of this case, the amount of the damage of embezzlement of this case was about 110 million won, and the amount of the damage was not less than 100 million won, and the victims did not agree with the victims, and there are no circumstances where the damage was restored. In addition, in order to prevent the crime of occupational embezzlement of this case from committing the crime of this case, the court below committed the crime of forging documents in order to avoid the crime of occupational embezzlement of this case, and taking full account of all the circumstances such as the circumstance and contents of the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, environment, occupation, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.