The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Based on its stated reasoning, the lower court determined that the Plaintiff, as the owner of the instant housing, is eligible for membership of the Defendant, and that there was a benefit to seek confirmation as long as the Defendant contests this.

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the above judgment of the court below is acceptable. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, it did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.