However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 18:40 on January 1, 2020, the Defendant expressed a desire to pay the drinking value and to return home from E, who is a police official belonging to the D Zone District of the Msan-dong Police Station, which was dispatched after receiving a report from 112, such as the Defendant’s cambling of the said E, three times at hand, and assaulted the said E’s chest, and the Defendant continued to have five times on his part.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to F and E by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a photograph by cutting a bar cinematographic image;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. An order to attend a lecture or an order to provide community service and a police officer who is performing official duties for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act has actively expressed a bath and exercised a tangible power.

However, the defendant recognizes and reflects the facts of crime.

Since 2004, a fine of 300,000 won is the only criminal record.

In addition, the sentencing conditions, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances, circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as per the order.