However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around June 12, 2012, the Defendant introduced the victim C (here, 1951 students, hereinafter “victim”) to D at the time of his/her preparation, and subsequently, determined that the victim was in conflict with D and caused the victim’s complaint.

Around June 2012, the Defendant, at the “Eju” located in Gwangju, voiceed the victim “Yju” to “YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY..

The defendant received from the victim of frighten drinking, the amount of KRW 20 million per month.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by threatening the victim.

(2) On February 28, 2013, at a place where the location is unknown, the Defendant drafted a letter to the effect that, on the grounds that the victim did not perform the written statement mentioned in paragraph (1) prior to the victim’s appearance with D and received mail from D and did not perform the written statement, the victim did not object to any punishment when the victim makes D and telephone calls in the future, and that, on the grounds that the victim did not object to any punishment, the Defendant demanded the victim to borrow the written statement mentioned in paragraph (1) above and made it heavier to the effect that the victim would be subject to criminal punishment by informing him/her of the fact of the victim’s influence in the event of non-compliance therewith.

The defendant's day from the victim of frighten, 2.