손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal and the changed claim in exchange in the trial are all dismissed.
2. After an appeal is filed.
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to this case is that “A” and “A” and “B” are not sufficient to recognize the Plaintiff’s assertion of defamation, and the “five million won” of the fourth and fourth acts of the court of first instance are referred to as “1.5 million won,” respectively, and the “written apology” of the first and tenth acts are referred to as “written decision,” and Article 3 of the same Act are referred to as “written decision,” respectively.
A. (2) In addition to the deletion of paragraph (3) and addition of Paragraph (3) as follows, the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. In addition, "Article 3-3-3. Subs. 3. Subs. 3, the defendant's act of preparing and distributing the appeal of this case constitutes a tort that damages the plaintiff's reputation, as well as the claim for damages against the defendant under the premise that the act constitutes a tort that damages the plaintiff's reputation, and the claim for a notice of the summary of the decision of the attached Form cannot
3. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim (including a claim that has been changed in exchange at the trial) is dismissed as all of the grounds for appeal. The judgment of the court of first instance that dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages is justified as the conclusion is consistent with this conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is dismissed as the plaintiff's claim