1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to the Defendants’ grounds of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the Defendants were guilty of all of the charges alleged in the grounds of appeal on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of appeal by the prosecutor in light of the record, the lower court is justifiable to have rendered a not-guilty verdict on the facts charged (excluding the part concerning the charge) of this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning on the grounds that there was no proof of the crime. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.