However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 13:55 on June 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the street in front of the “Ccafeteria” in Kimpo-si B, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si; (b) without any reason, she collected an outer hurb from the E-Wured vehicle driven by the victim D without drinking alcohol.

Therefore, the victim's loss caused by the driver's her driver's her driver's her driver's her driver's her part at one time, and her driver's her part her with the left side of the victim's her, and her driver's her driver's her part, her driver's her driver's her part, her

2. At around 14:10 on June 8, 2014, the obstruction of performance of official duties and the Defendant injured the Defendant: (a) sent out after receiving 112 reports; and (b) took the slicker reported on the face of slope G belonging to the Kimpo Police Station, which controlled the assault as described in paragraph (1), and continued to interfere with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties; (c) at the same time, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s face when taking the main set of the patrol vehicle into hand and dricked the slicker’s face; and (d) sustained injury, such as catum fat, which requires two weeks of treatment to the said G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police officer's statement about D and G;

1. A H statement;

1. 8 copies, such as a damaged part, on-site photograph, etc., the police box service log, each investigation report, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The scope of recommendations (the sentencing criteria for the commercial concurrent crimes shall not apply, but shall refer to the sentencing criteria for some crimes) shall be the crimes of obstruction of the execution of official duties.