However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 13, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime of September 2013, 2013, at around 20:00, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s operation of the carpets by force by force, such as by force, on the wind of avoiding disturbance, allowing customers to take out from the outside, and thereby obstructing the Defendant’s operation of the carpets by force.

2. On September 21, 2013, the Defendant reported on September 21, 2013, as stated in the above paragraph (1) in the Ecar Paf as of September 23:30, 2013, and when the victim reported it to the police and was investigated by the police, the Defendant used the same fact as stated in the above paragraph (1), and refused to comply with the request of the Defendant without any justifiable reason, for the purpose of retaliation against the victim in relation to the investigation of his criminal case, Gab (23 cm in length), which is a dangerous object that had been located on the part of the victim’s ship, with the same as the hazardous substance on the part of the victim’s ship.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Partial statement of the witness F in the court;

1. A protocol of examination of part of the defendant by prosecution;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol regarding D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the damage of property, photographs, site photographs;

1. Article 36 of the relevant Act on the Punishment of Criminal Crimes, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 5-9(2) and (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 3(1) and 2(1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act.