A. On August 11, 201, at around 06:45, C passed through two private distance intersections, where two persons, such as E, F, etc., are located in the stolen D 100ccoba (hereinafter “the instant Obaba”), and the instant Obaba, in line with the signal, etc. at the front of an Ebabbbbbban apartment located in the Sinsan City, Ansan City, by driving the instant Obababa, and in line with the signal, from the STX apartment room to the lub village apartment room located in the STX apartment, at two-lanes along the direction of the proceeding, while driving the 10ccobababa (hereinafter “instant Obababa”), and the part of the G driver’s Hababababa and the part of the instant case was killed by more than 107 Hababababa, and died from the 17thaba.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

In the instant case, Oral Ba had not been covered by the liability insurance policy. However, the Plaintiff entrusted the government’s business of guaranteeing motor vehicle accident compensation under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and paid KRW 112,772,490,00,000 for compensation based on the said guaranteed business to I, who was affiliated with J on October 25, 201, and paid KRW 13,871,510,00 for the insurance money to I, who was affiliated with the deceased E, as the insurer of the automobile comprehensive insurance contract including the automobile accident guarantee agreement that compensates the insured for the injury within a certain scope. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 2329, Dec. 16, 2011>

C. The Defendants, as parents of C, succeeded to C’s property one-half each.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1-8, Gap evidence No. 10-1 through 6, Gap evidence No. 11, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The network C’s liability for damages caused the instant accident by negligence, such as violating the signal while driving the instant sea-to-land without obtaining the driver’s license.