If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

No person shall transfer a means of access under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.

Nevertheless, at around 11:00 on May 21, 2013, the Defendant issued a letter to the effect that he/she would lend a passbook by accessing NAV car page via the Internet, and was willing to transfer the passbook, password, etc. under the name of the Defendant to another person.

On May 21, 2013, the Defendant sent two new bank accounts (Account Number B and C) with the name of the Defendant, and cash cards and security cards related to the accounts among the above accounts, and sent them to the “Gang-speed terminal” located in the Seocho-gu Seoul distribution Dong, and sent them to the person who is a one-time phone (E) with D’s cell phone, and notified the password of the above accounts by posting them to D’s cell phone.

On the 22th day of the same month, the Defendant continued to display a cash card and security card in the bank B account to D through Kwikset Service in front of the Defendant’s house located in Gangnam-si, Gangwon-do.

Accordingly, the Defendant transferred the means of access under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act to another person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Relevant photographs;

1. Details of the use of each means of access transferred;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of the transfer cost;

1. Article 49 (4) 1 and Article 6 (3) 1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 40 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (the transfer of each means of access as of May 21, 2013)

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.