except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, at around 01:00 on November 18, 2018, at the main point of “C” located in Ansan-si B, where the victim D (the 50-year-old-old-old-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si (the 50-year-old-si) visited the above main point as a customer, and was in dispute with the face of the victim, and continued to spread the beer’s head to the face of the victim, and continued to spread the beer’s head to the face of the victim, and continued to spread the beer’s head to the face of the victim, one time at the back head of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation: Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution: The defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, has been suffering from suffering from a fluoral disease, which is a dangerous thing, thereby putting the head of the victim in the upper room.

In light of the means of action and the parts of the injury, the nature of the crime is not very good because there is a risk of serious danger and injury.

However, the defendant did not have the same criminal records or severe punishment force, and is recognized of his mistake and reflects his depth. It is so decided as per Disposition in full view of the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.