1. Around 03:08 on September 4, 2013, the Defendant entering the Hanam Police Station located in the 27th Hanam-si, Hanam-si, Hanam-si, Hanam-si, demanded from a police officer to take a drinking test on the ground that he was asked from a police officer to take a drinking test, and that he was in compliance with the drinking test, the Defendant was in mind of having a collision with the traffic patrol vehicle operated by the police officer who controlled him, and entered the Hanam Police Station as it was, and entered the Hanam Police Station as it was, regardless of the removal of D around the day.

As a result, the Defendant intruded into the subordinate police station, which is a structure managed by D around the day of the Gyeonggi-do Police Station belonging to the victim Gyeonggi-do Police Station.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at the time and place set forth in the above paragraph (1) above, and for the foregoing reason, the Defendant received the back part of the vehicle of the traffic patrol owned by the National Police Agency, and damaged the repair cost to KRW 1,326,277.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the traffic patrol vehicles, which are goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the spot and damaged photographs;

1. Article 141(1) and Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;