마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. Facts charged and the defendant's assertion
A. On March 17, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Seoul East Eastern District Court (hereinafter “Seoul East Eastern District Court”) and completed the execution of the sentence at the Gangnam Prison on January 26, 2009.
Defendant is not a narcotics handler.
(1) On March 27, 2011, the Defendant, along with C, promised C to purchase and administer psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related Mescopon and to “to give the price for the Mescopon upon the Mescopon.”
C received the Defendant’s order on March 26, 201, around 21:00, from the first floor of E buildings located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, 700,000 won as the price for the purchase of philopon, and 1g of philopon from the former.
Around 17:00 on March 27, 201, the Defendant received approximately 0.7ggh from C out of the chophones purchased from Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, and paid KRW 500,000,000 to be borne by the Defendant.
Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with C to purchase philophones.
(2) On March 27, 2011, around March 27, 2011, the Defendant administered phiphones in the Defendant’s house located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, containing approximately KRW 0.05g of phiphones purchased as referred to in the preceding paragraph (1), into a single-use injection machine, dilution with raw water, and injection into the arms.
B. On March 201, 201, the Defendant’s assertion that C had no address and found in the Defendant’s house, and caused C to live in one column with a female, and C was able to drive away from his house because C was unable to believe C due to the same reason as he saw C’s loss on narcotics, and the Defendant purchased a penphone from C as indicated in the facts charged and administered it.
2. The statement at C’s investigative agency and this Court, as well as the notice of the results of the appraisal of narcotics, etc., that the Defendant is admitted as evidence that he/she purchased or administered phiphonephones as described in the facts charged.