However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On April 27, 2015, the event C of the said investigation document concluded a sub-lease contract with the Defendant at the office located in the first floor of the building in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government DD building, and issued a written consent for sub-lease in the name of the lessor E, which is a private document on the rights and duties that the Defendant is forged so that he/she can register as a business operator.

After that, on May 26, 2015, the Defendant, along with C, filed an application for registration of a proprietor of the business of beauty art business in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, with the name of “F” at the Gangnam-gu Tax Office, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, for registration of beauty art business, and submitted the re-lease agreement forged by C, as if it was a document duly formed, to a public official in the name of the said tax office without knowledge of the forgery.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with C to use a forged E-lease consent form.

2. Around May 17, 2017, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Seoul Central District Court’s order 522, which was located in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court at the center of Seocho-gu, Seoul, 157, as a witness of the above court’s order 8330 order 2016 order 8330 order 830 order 201.