대여금
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 113,663,012 and KRW 60,000 among the costs, from July 22, 2015 to the day of full payment.
1. As to the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the cause of the claim, the Defendant did not reside in the Republic of Korea on April 19, 2007, which is the date of the instant loan, and the Defendant did not receive any contact from the Busan Savings Bank, Inc. at any later time, as well as the loan money on the loan money, and there was no document written by oman B on his own. Thus, the claim of this case cannot be complied with.
Therefore, according to the overall purport of each statement and pleading of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (including virtual numbers) in early March 2006, the defendant received D's audit position for a special purpose corporation, which was managed by the Busan Savings Bank, as the introduction of his own office in the early March 2006, and the defendant explained that the Busan Savings Bank is a nominal shareholder, as the defendant operated the above company, the defendant was issued a certificate of his own seal on April 16, 2007, the defendant issued the certificate of his own seal on April 16, 2007, Eul delivered the above certificate of seal impression and the defendant's seal impression to the F, who was an employee of the Egypian, and the defendant received the total amount of KRW 79.6 million from the Busan Savings Bank from July 2006 to November 201. In light of the above facts, in light of the above facts, the defendant's assertion that the defendant was not obligated to accept the defendant's comprehensive delegation contract.
[Defendant filed a lawsuit to confirm the existence of the obligation with respect to the instant loan, but the Busan High Court decided on March 19, 2015 (Supreme Court Decision 2013Na7011 Decided March 19, 2015).