2. The judgment appears to have recognized the Defendant’s mistake and reflect it, that the Defendant agreed with the victim, while the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for August, 2008 with prison labor for 2012, with prison labor for 4 months in 2008, with prison labor for 5 months in 2005, without prison labor for 3 million won in 2010, with prison labor for 2010, with prison labor for 8 times in the same kind of crime. The Defendant was sentenced to eight times for 2010, with prison labor for 8 months in 2012, and the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime after the execution of the sentence was completed on July, 2013, considering all kinds of sentencing conditions in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, circumstance and consequence of the instant crime, etc., the Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable is not reasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 346 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.