beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.10.21 2015가단102422

손해배상(산)

Text

1. Defendant Dong Construction Co., Ltd.: 236,762,461 won and 5% per annum from October 10, 2012 to October 21, 2016.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant Dongdong Construction Co., Ltd.

(a) Grounds for claims: as shown in the attached Form;

(b) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act (Judgment by deemed as private capital);

2. Determination on the plaintiff's claim against the present engineering corporation of the defendant corporation

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The defendant's current engineering corporation (hereinafter "the defendant's present engineering").

Defendant Dong Construction Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Dong Construction”)

(2) The construction of the instant construction project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction”) that was contracted by Nonparty Korea Land and Housing Corporation.

(1) The Plaintiff, who was employed by the Defendant’s Doc Engineering, was partly awarded a subcontract. From September 28, 2012 to October 9, 2012, the Plaintiff suffered injury to the Plaintiff, who had been employed by the Defendant’s Docctrine engineering, such as paralysis, urine, urine, urine, and urine disorder, etc. (hereinafter “the instant injury”).

(2) The Plaintiff was employed by Defendant Do Engineering by receiving signatures on the work certificate on the day of submitting it to the Manpower Office from Defendant Do Engineering’s employees C, and upon receiving D’s instructions dispatched from Defendant Do Engineering, the Plaintiff performed the work of cutting concrete structures and other works at the construction site of this case.

However, during the construction of this case, the construction of concrete structure was at the work of shouldering the connecting part of the concrete structure by using heavy stimuls with heavy stimuls in narrow spaces. As such, the Defendant’s present-level engineering, despite the fact that it did not take such safety measures, did not take such measures as having the Plaintiff take convenient work for the other concrete structure of concrete structure, having the Plaintiff take sufficient rest, or having the Plaintiff take proper rest and work as a correct person, thereby resulting in the injury of the Plaintiff.

3 Accordingly, the defendant.