2. The judgment of the defendant is contrary to the recognition of all of the crimes of this case, but the amount of damage does not completely recover from the name up to the trial of the court. The defendant committed the crime of this case as an employee of the victim, with trust relationship, and the quality of the crime of this case is not only poor, but also poor. The above amount of damage is consumed by gambling and amusement expenses, etc., the victim wanting to punish the defendant's severe punishment seven times (three times, three times, three times, three times, and four times,), and other factors of sentencing as shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances of the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.