However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[200 Hashes 6042]

1. On August 24, 2020, the Defendant issued orders for food, such as chickens and beverages, to D operated by the victim C using "the nation of delivery of smartphone flock," at the Jeju Northern-gu B Public Notice around 05:00 on August 24, 2020, and received such orders from the victim, and then, the Defendant sent the amount of food to the account up to 09:00.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay food to the victim because he did not have any property.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and provided food equivalent to the market price of 75,600 won from the injured party, but did not pay the amount, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

"200 Highest 6136"

2. Around 01:21 on September 23, 2020, the Defendant ordered “H” operated by the victim G using the “national group of delivery of smartphone friphone” from 01:21, Gwangju Mine E-gu, Gwangju, the Defendant ordered the Defendant to do so, such as soing, making soup, call, air bry, etc., and then, the Defendant received it, and then sent the amount of food to the Defendant’s I bank account in the victim’s name “not later than three times.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay food to the victim because he did not have any property.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and provided food equivalent to the market price of 38,000 won from the injured party, but did not pay the price, thereby acquiring the same property profit.

3. On October 01, 2020, the Defendant ordered food, such as making soup, making soup, and making soup, sent by phone call to the “K” operated by the victim J, from around 01:30, Gwangju Mine E-gu, Gwangju, Gwangju, the Defendant received a soup, and then did not receive approval with the card in the name of the Defendant, and then did not receive approval with the card in the name of the victim.