However, it is against the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is a Cinti G35 car, Defendant B is a driver of Dindi A6 car.

1. The drivers of motor vehicles, etc. that violate the Road Traffic Act shall not inflict any danger or injury on other persons or cause any danger or injury to traffic while driving their motor vehicles jointly with two or more persons on the road in front, rear, or right or right or right or right or right or right or right or right or right or right or right,

Nevertheless, at around 00:20 on April 2, 2017, the Defendants, driving each of the above vehicles, caused the danger of traffic by causing traffic accidents in the course of driving by Defendant A, while passing ahead or passing one another at a speed of more than 140 km, without securing the safety distance, from the 1188-9 free from the front and front of the Sin-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Seojin-gu, Seoul to the front and front roads.

2. The Defendants in violation of the Road Traffic Act committed an act of driving along the vehicle without securing the safety distance with the vehicle running ahead of it, on the date, at the place, and even though the speed of the said road is 90km/h, the speed of the said road continues to exceed 140km/h, thereby causing danger to traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Partial statement of the witness F in the court;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants by the prosecution

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspects concerning G;

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. Request for an investigation into insurance fraud;

1. Recording notes (dialoges between drivers per accident);

1. Copy of the report on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Blue boxes and video CDs for automobiles in IKamaro;

1. The main photograph of the act of common danger;

1. Each investigation report (report on the circumstances, etc. of the accident and the confirmation of the status of the black box);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of comprehensive traffic accident analysis;

1. Relevant Article 150 subparagraph 1 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 46 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime; and