2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. B filed a complaint against the Plaintiff on January 12, 2005 against violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (at night), and the Plaintiff filed a complaint against B during the investigation process against B as the main building, the attempted crime of fire prevention, and the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (at night).

On May 4, 2005, the plaintiff was arrested in relation to the above accusation case. On May 7, 2005, the plaintiff was arrested for further examination on May 7, 2005, and was prosecuted on August 30, 2005 by Daejeon District Court 2005 Godan2305.

[The Daejeon District Public Prosecutor's Office has no suspicion of attempted principal building B as to the same day, and it is concluded that there was no prosecution as to the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (at night violence). The plaintiff was detained in the Daejeon Prison on January 4, 2006, which was under trial.

B. On April 12, 2006, the Daejeon District Court sentenced the plaintiff on April 12, 2006 that "the defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, 99 days in detention before the pronouncement of this judgment shall be included in the above sentence: Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive,"

m. was finalized 20.

The summary of the criminal facts of the above judgment was that the plaintiff got money from the South Korean living together with him and damaged his honor.

C. Meanwhile, on August 30, 2005, the Plaintiff appealed against the non-prosecution decision issued by the Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office, but was dismissed, and the reappeal was also dismissed.

On September 4, 2006, the Plaintiff filed a request for reexamination on the grounds that various evidence records and protocol of trial were prepared falsely with respect to the above judgment, but the request for reexamination was dismissed on November 6 of the same year, and the above decision became final and conclusive on the 10th of the same month.

Daejeon District Court Order 2006Ma2 dated November 6, 2006

On July 20, 2010, the Plaintiff again requested a new trial against the above judgment, but the same year.

9.8. The same reasons is the same for a matter that was a decision to dismiss the review.