beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.04.04 2013고합527

마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of two years and six months;

2. AM-2201 (A) 27.05g (Evidence 1), AM-2201 (B) 26.47g (Evidence 2), seized.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. When the Defendant orders D, who was aware of the psychotropic drugs, to keep a similar body of JWH-018, to keep the same body, he/she was asked by the Defendant to request D to designate D’s residence as a place for delivery of goods. The Defendant received his/her consent.

On September 23, 2013, the Defendant visited the Chinese Internet site (htp:/www.forth, 019, 081, 122, 210, and the destination as D’s residence, ordered a similar object of JWH-018, psychotropic drugs, which came from China and arrived at the Incheon Country of Supply, to receive approximately 81.7ggg, approximately 81.7g, MAM-2201, and approximately 28.59g, around October 28, 201, the Defendant passed the Incheon International Airport Search Center through around 337, 2013.

2. From October 9, 2013 to October 14, 2013, the Defendant administered the psychotropic substances JWH-018’s quantity of similar body in an influorous manner between the Defendant and around October 9, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement by the prosecution concerning D;

1. Analysis result report, revision of the quantity of articles in violation, response to requests for appraisal, replys to requests for appraisal, additional replys to requests for appraisal, and replys to whether they fall under narcotics;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 58 (1) 3, Article 3 subparagraph 5, subparagraph 3 (a) of Article 2 and Article 60 (1) 1, and subparagraph 1 of Article 3 and subparagraph 3 (a) of Article 2 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (the occupation of smoking in the SP and the choice of imprisonment) on criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of summing up the long-term punishments in each of the crimes above);

1. The favorable circumstances for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act are the reasons for discretionary mitigation.