매매대금
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.
1. The scope of the judgment in this Court claimed against the defendant for the payment of the remaining amount of KRW 322,168,238,238, excluding the remaining amount of KRW 322,168,238,238, and delay damages therefrom. The court of first instance recognized the payment of KRW 500,000 as KRW 322,168,238, and determined the remainder of KRW 177,831,762, excluding the settlement amount of the plaintiff's claim, and the delay damages therefrom as the plaintiff's claim. The defendant's defense was part of the contract amount or indemnity amount of KRW 72,108,20,00 as part of the defendant's claim against the plaintiff, and accepted part of the amount of the plaintiff's claim as KRW 105,723,562,562 (=17,831,762,722,728,208 and delay damages).
On the other hand, the part of the defense part rejected by the Defendant in appeal, namely, ① the substitute payment of the National Pension Management Corporation 6,00,000 won, ② the settlement of the admission fees 19,265,00 won, ③ the additional recognition of the part of KRW 31,945,00 in total of KRW 6,680,000, is dissatisfied with the part of the defense part rejected by the Defendant in excess of the above Defendant’s damages for delay. As such, the scope of the trial on the political party’s appeal is limited to the part against the above Defendant.
2. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which is to be presented by this court, is that part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, including the judgment on the party's allegations and evidence submitted at the court of first instance, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal as set forth in the following paragraph (3). Thus, this is
3. Parts to be dried;
A. Article 7(c) of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be conducted with the following parts: “Settlement of Credit Purchase Price: Pursuant to each of the statements in the evidence Nos. 600,000 witness N's testimony, Gap evidence No. 2, Eul evidence No. 7-2, and Eul evidence No. 12, the plaintiff's business time.