The lower court convicted the Defendant of the instant facts charged.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on willful negligence, the principle of liability for act, the fraud, and the elements for establishing embezzlement, etc. in its judgment, contrary to what is alleged in

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.