건설산업기본법위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (eight million won in penalty) is too unhued and unreasonable.
2. The lower court sentenced a fine of KRW 8 million, taking into account the favorable and unfavorable circumstances to the Defendant.
When comprehensively taking into account the facts that are the conditions for sentencing in the trial, in particular, the Defendant completed education to obtain a comprehensive construction license, the status and sentencing guidelines, and the sentencing guidelines, the lower court’s judgment exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.
There is no circumstance that it is unfair to maintain the judgment of the court below as it is or that the judgment of the court below is unfair.
In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances, and result of the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is appropriate, and it does not seem unfair because it is too unfasible.
Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.
3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit and is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.