절도등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. From around 14:00 to 15:00 on Apr. 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) discovered an amount equivalent to KRW 650,00 of the market price of the gallon 2 mobile phones owned by the victim B and then stolen around the first floor shock of the Busan National University Library 428, Nam-gu, Busan National University Library; (b) discovered the amount equivalent to KRW 650,00 of the gallon 2 mobile phones owned by the victim B; and (c)
2. When the Defendant came to know of the victim D (the age of 17) through the app Co., Ltd., the Defendant forcedd to do so, the Defendant received 26 copies of the photograph of the son’s chest and scar image from the victim from March 29, 2017 to March 19:35, 2017, with the victim’s proposal, to the next day 01:45, the Defendant received 26 copies of the photograph of the son’s chest and scar image from the victim using the app.
On March 30, 2017, at around 03:01, the Defendant demanded to send the F building in Busan Metropolitan City, and around 102 702 Dong 702, the Defendant continued to leave the “E” by affixing the victim’s face and chests. The Defendant would be easy to find one of the instant “C” app pages with the “C” app page, and would be difficult to find one of the widths in the Gansan-do unemployment difficulties located in Ansan, and would bring about this problem by making it possible for the Defendant to talk.
888 delivered a letter "I am soon to delete it?"
In order to disseminate the photographs and videos of the victimized person or to make a threat as if they were known to the surroundings.
Accordingly, the victim joined the “E” and sent an E message to the effect that the Defendant did not have any idea to keep the Defendant in contact, and that the Defendant did not think that he would have been able to do so. There was no thought that he would have been able to do so. The Defendant did not think that she would be able to do so, and that she would not have any way to unilaterally block she would have been asked to do so, and that she would not have been asked to do so, and that she would not have a face so that she sent a chest.”
If one does not hear his speech, the victim has been threatened as he spreads the victim's photograph and video.