On the grounds indicated in its reasoning, the lower court rejected the Defendant’s appeal claiming the facts, defense or legitimate act, and upheld the first instance judgment, which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on self-defense or legitimate act, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.