When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 17, 2015, the Defendant 2016, 13:30 on November 17, 2015, the Defendant obstructed the operation of the victim’s management office by force by avoiding disturbance, such as putting the stick which he/she was investigating, on the ground that the victim D ( South, 57 years of age), working at the management office of the apartment of the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, is negligent in performing its duties.

The Defendant of “2016 High 427”, from around 10:00 on November 5, 2015 to around 10:30 on the same day, went well to her head at the management office of the apartment complex at the location of the management office of the Namyang-si, Nam-si, Namyang-si, which is a public property of the apartment.

With regard to this case, the Si expenses were reduced, and the victim D ( South, 57 years of age) interfered with the management office operation of the victim by force by avoiding the disturbance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Application of each statute of the D;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act bearing Costs of Trial;