If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

On April 6, 2018, the Defendant is a person who drives a liquid sports vehicle C before the window B of Changwon-si, Changwon-si on April 6, 2018.

Police officers shall have driven an automobile under the influence of alcohol.

When there is a good reason to designate a person, a breath test may be conducted to determine whether a driver is under the influence of alcohol, and in such cases the driver shall comply with a breath test of a police officer.

The defendant, at the time, drives a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, such as snicking, snicking, snicking on the face, snicking, and walking without walking.

There is a reasonable reason to determine a person, so it was demanded to take a drinking test due to the transportation at the police station guard of the Seocho-gu Changwon who controlled drinking at the same time, and the respiratory test of the method of injecting the whole in a drinking measuring instrument from D police officers E.

Nevertheless, on April 6, 2018, the Defendant rejected the second measurement at around 20:30 on the same day, including the Defendant’s failure to comply with a request for the measurement of the above drinking at the above place on April 6, 2018; the second measurement refusal at around 20:35 on the same day; and the third measurement refusal at around 20:40 on the same day; and the fourth measurement refusal at around 20:40 on the same day, and did not comply with the police

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing drinking pictures and photographs CDs;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) (Punishment) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order;

1. The Defendant asserted that “the Defendant’s refusal to measure the Defendant is justifiable on the ground that he did not comply with the internal guidelines to the effect that a traffic control police officer requires to measure drinking more than three times at intervals of five minutes, at intervals of five minutes, a total of KRW 173,400,00 for travel expenses and daily expenses paid to three witnesses based on a national defense counsel of KRW 300,000 (i.e., KRW 57,800) (i., KRW 57,800).”