beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.11.28 2017고합112

배임수재등

Text

In the case of the crimes of No. 1-A, B, and No. 2, the crimes of No. 1-2, 3 and 4 in the judgment of the defendant, four months of imprisonment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On February 4, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment for perjury and 2 years of suspended execution at the Busan District Court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on February 25, 2016 and is currently in the grace period.

[2] The Defendant, from August 1, 2001 to August 31, 201, was in office as the head of the E Union F. F. Trade Union Dispute Resolution Branch, and the operator of the city bus recommended by the union in order to establish a smooth relationship with the union in the K.S., and the Defendant is entitled to exercise the right to recommend a new operator as the head of the union in this section, and the Defendant exercises a considerable influence on the recruitment of a new operator by the F. In addition, the Defendant exercises the right to recommend a new operator.

1. Acceptance of property in breach of trust;

A. On May 2015, the Defendant: (a) had been employed as a driver of an urban bus from I, who was a member company of the same company, in the office of the FM in Busan Shipping Daegu; and (b) had been employed as a driver of an urban bus from I, a member company of the same company.

G was offered KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000, which was paid by G to I as the job-seeking cost for the operator through I, in response to the solicitation that he/she would be employed as a full-time driver of the city bus.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property in exchange for illegal solicitation in relation to his duties.

B. On January 2016, the Defendant: (a) was employed in the office of the F.A. M. M. F. A. F. M. management office; (b) from K, a company partner, as an intra-city driver; and (c) had been employed by the Defendant.

J was asked to be employed as a full-time driver of the city bus finance company F. The defendant did not pay 5 million won to K in return.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired financial benefits in return for illegal solicitation in relation to his duties.

(c)

L Employment-related breach of trust by the Defendant has been employed by the F. M. M. F. management office in June 2016 from M. who is a partner of the same company to the city bus driver.

L is 14 million won in cash, which has been granted to M through M with the working log funds of the operator company, in return for a request to be employed as a full-time operator of the city bus F. M.