beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2020.07.24 2020고단240

감염병의예방및관리에관한법률위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Minister of Health and Welfare, a Mayor/Do Governor, or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu shall take measures to prevent the spread of an infectious disease upon the outbreak of the infectious disease in an appropriate place for a specific period, and no person shall comply with such measures.

On April 18, 2020, the Defendant entered the Australia to the Republic of Korea through the Incheon Airport and was suspected of having contacted with the patient with an infectious disease. From the public market, the isolation period was from April 18, 2020 to May 2, 2020, the isolation period was from the public market to the period from April 18, 2020 to the period from May 2, 2020, by a person who enters the quarantine area to B when the Defendant’s residence was located.

Nevertheless, at around 15:10 on April 23, 2020, the Defendant collected trine in a dry field owned by the Defendant 20 meters away from the Defendant’s dwelling place located in the above isolation place, and did not comply with the above measures for isolation.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in the court to the effect that breadth has been collected in dry field owned by the defendant during the period of self-Isolation;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A written accusation of the public utility market;

1. A copy of the quarantine notice;

1. The photograph of the deserter line [the dry field that the defendant collected blurged by the defendant is not the length for people to frequent, so it is not a violation of the measures for self-recovering. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence, namely, the defendant's place for self-recovering, required to permit the public market to escape from the defendant's residential area. Nevertheless, the defendant arbitrarily moved to the dry field owned by the defendant, and considering the fact that the defendant violated the measures for self-recovering because it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant violated the measures for self-recovering.