However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 20, 2018, the Defendant: (a) boarded a taxi on the front side of the “C Authorized Broker” located in B at the time of lighting around 02:30, but (b) refused to leave the taxi without the destination; (c) on the same day, the Defendant called “E” on the front of the “C Authorized Broker”; (d) on the front side of the “C Authorized Broker”; (c) on the front side of the “C Authorized Broker”; (d) on the same day, on the front of the “C Authorized Broker”; and (d) on the front of the “B”, called “B”, called “B” and “B”, called “B” and called “E” and called “B” and “B” on the front side of the said patrol.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV video data CDs and other closures;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., the confession of the defendant, the robbery of violence, and the fact that there is no criminal record in the Republic of Korea);

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;