However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A, around 00:50 on June 19, 2013, is in front of the Franchiste E in Changsisibro, Masibroon, and is in diversology.

At the time of a kind of disturbance, the police officer's legitimate execution of duties was obstructed, when the police officer was able to return home from the H of the Msandong Police Station, the police officer of the Msandong Police Station who was dispatched after receiving a report, H of the Msandong Police Station, the face of the above I 4 times as a drinking, and when he was taken once as a drinking a part of the H of the horse Ha's clothes, and the police officer's legitimate execution of duties.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the place, in accordance with paragraph (1), received contact from the said female-friendly group of female-child group, and thereafter, the victim I from the said female-friendly group of female-child group of female-child group of female-child group of female-child group of female-child group of female-child group of female-child group of female-child group of female-child group of female-child group of female-child group of female-child group of female-child group of group of group

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to I, J and H

1. Defendant A of the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Imprisonment): Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Incompetence, etc.) of the suspended execution (Defendant A);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;