2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. While the Plaintiff was working as a production-general director of B (hereinafter “instant place of business”), from May 18, 2016 to May 19:50, 201, the Plaintiff was placed in the emergency room of C Hospital from May 18, 2016, and the Gu soil was continuously located in the emergency room of C Hospital at around 01:20, and was diagnosed with acute cerebriform (hereinafter “instant disease”).

B. On December 14, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for the first medical care benefits for industrial accident compensation insurance with the Defendant. On April 28, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval of medical care benefits (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that it does not appear to be brain color on the ground that it is difficult to recognize the relationship with brain coloring operations.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap 2, 3 evidence, Eul 1, the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments

2. The legality of the instant disposition

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was affected by excessive business and stress due to business trips, frequent business trips, poor management, etc. after entering the instant workplace.

Inasmuch as the Plaintiff’s overwork and stress led to cerebral tension or aggravation, there is a causal relationship between the work and the instant disease.

The instant disposition taken on a different premise must be revoked in an unlawful manner.

(b)as shown in Appendix 1 of the relevant regulations;

C. 1) The Plaintiff’s work history had been employed in the instant workplace on April 6, 2016 and had been employed as a general director in charge of business, production, and quality for six weeks from May 18, 2016. The representative of the instant workplace had worked daily, but did not remain in the office continuously. According to the certificate of career and four major insurance data, the Plaintiff mainly performed the duties of quality control, production management, etc. from July 5, 198 to March 10, 2016, and the Plaintiff mainly performed the duties of quality control, production management, etc. from July 10, 198, to March 10, 2016. The Plaintiff had been employed in the instant workplace and had been employed in the instant workplace for six weeks from May 18, 2016.