beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.10.12 2018고합338

강도등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's right of defense, part of the facts charged was appropriately revised.

On January 27, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment by the Seoul Northern District Court for attempted fraud, etc. on January 27, 2015, and the execution of the sentence was completed at the Cheongju Women’s Prison on August 5, 2017.

"2018 High 338" defendant was in a state of weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to the disorder of editing mental division, the disorder of illumination, etc.

1. The defendant in violation of passenger transport business shall obtain a license from the Minister of Construction and Transportation when he intends to operate a passenger transport business from a person who operates rocketing other vehicles;

Nevertheless, at around 00:00 on March 26, 2018, the Defendant used the above vehicle to take 60,000 won in front of the exit 10 hours in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant used the above vehicle in front of the exit 10 hours in Seocho-gu, Seoul, and run a non-licensed passenger transport business at a cost by operating approximately 61 km through the Ansan F Station, and operating a non-licensed passenger transport business.

2. The Defendant, while drinking alcohol together with the victim, induced the victim E (59 years old) to the victim in Ansan-do, Ansan-do, Ansan-do, and Seocheon-do, led to the victim’s confusion. The Defendant induced the victim to the telecom by drinking alcohol with the victim, making the victim’s sexual intercourse defective.

At around 00:57 on March 26, 2018, the Defendant: (a) caused the victim to drink a ice stroke that contains talian stroke, a local mental medicine medicine; (b) prevented the victim from resisting by getting the victim to sleep, and (c) took cash of KRW 480,000 on the part of the victim’s wall and stroke.

3. The Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

At the time and place specified in paragraph 2, the Defendant administered a stroke drug in such a way as to allow E, who is not aware of the circumstances, to take a stroke drug containing a stroke, a local mental medicine.

"2018, 550".