beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2018.05.09 2016고단755 (1)

공무집행방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B and C are foreigners of the nationality of the Republic of Korea of the People of the Republic of China who are engaged in steel work at the construction site of the D Apartment-si in Chungcheongnam-si.

1. The Defendant interfering with his/her duties, in collusion with B and C on July 7, 2016, found “F” in the restaurant called “F in Chungcheong City E” around 21:40 on July 7, 2016.

The victim G, who is an employee, has failed to perform his/her behavior such as provoking, sound, and drinking a vision to other customers. The victim G, who is an employee, did not perform his/her alcohol with the thickness of the President.

“On the ground that it was said that the said restaurant business was interfered with by force for about 15 minutes, such as having a customer who was involved in the disturbance go home, and having the customer who was involved in the disturbance go home, as a boomed to the breath’s hand, and throw the boomed down.

2. From July 22:00 on July 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the performance of official duties and the Defendant injured the Defendant: (b) obstructed the Defendants’ disturbance; (c) obstructed the Defendants’ disturbance by the Ha, J, J, Ha, and Haman of the Haj Police Station, who was called up after receiving an employee’s 112 report in front of the restaurant as described in paragraph (1) of the said Article; and (d) stated that “Korean police sent a desire to “I Mep” and the circumstances leading up to the victims of damage (41 years of age) will not take a bath.

On the other hand, violence was committed by cutting down a balth of the victim's balth, cutting over the floor by cutting down the balth, cutting down the victim's b above the floor, cutting down the victim's b, arresting the victim, cutting down the victim's body, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, inflicted bodily harm on the left part of the Defendant, which requires two-time medical treatment, and thereby interfered with the police officer’s 112 reporting processing duties and the lawful execution of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offenders in collusion with B.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. Each statement made by the co-defendant B and C in the first trial record;

1. Each police statement made to G and I;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of photographic pictures of injury 1.