beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.08.17 2014나58060

손해배상

Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part on Plaintiff D’s Defendant Bar Card Co., Ltd. is revoked, and Plaintiff D’s Defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs opened a deposit account with Defendant Woori Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Co., Ltd.” or “ Incorporated Association” in the name of a legal entity), the National Bank, Nonghyup Bank, Daegu Bank, Korea Bank, Korea Standards-based Bank, National Agricultural Cooperative Federation (hereinafter referred to as “CF”), Jeonbuk Bank, Hannam Bank prior to the merger, Hannam Bank, Hannam Bank, Hannam Bank, Hannam Bank (hereinafter referred to as “Seoul Bank, but not after the merger”), Defendant’s postal offices under the Postal Savings and Insurance Act (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant’s Postal Service Office”), and used Internet banking services, etc. while conducting financial transactions.

B. The Plaintiffs, as indicated in the attached table Nos. 4, informed the Plaintiffs of the false website that they were exposed to a false call from a person who assumes a false name from the public prosecutor’s office or the National Police Agency’s office, and that they were involved in a crime by stealing the Plaintiffs’ names, such false information was disclosed by means of inputting financial transaction information, such as credit card numbers and passwords, effective period, deposit account numbers and passwords, and security card numbers.

C. Using the financial information received from the Plaintiffs as above from the Defendant Financial Settlement Agency, K, K, K, L, D, M, P, U, V, E, E, E, A, AB, AE, AE, AE, AF, B, AJ, AJ, AP, AP, Q, ASS, ATS, AS, AV, AV, AV, AV, AY, AY, AZ, BB, BF, BF, BI, B, or BJ (hereinafter “40 persons, including Plaintiff F, etc.”) and the Plaintiff’s authorized certificate obtained as above and the financial transaction information under the Plaintiff’s name.