In addition, the summary of the grounds for appeal by the defense counsel (misunderstanding of the facts) is as follows: (a) the Defendant sought a wedding hall in the Defendant’s wife as a matter of money relationship with the Defendant’s wife; (b) the Defendant sought the Defendant’s scam and scam the Defendant’s scam, and tried to scam the Defendant’s scam, and (c) the Defendant did not inflict any injury on C’s arms by cutting off or scam the Defendant’s arms.

Nevertheless, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case and erred by mistake.

Judgment

The court below consistently stated from the investigative agency to the court of the court below that "A was able to recognize the following circumstances, i.e., (i) the victim C was consistently aware from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below that "A she was frighting along the Defendant's wife Eul, and she was frighting on the left part, and the Defendant was frighting on the left part, and she was frighting on the left part, and she was frighting on the left part," and (ii) at the investigative agency to be in charge of security service for D at the request of the Defendant and D, she was frighting on the above marriage in order of D, the victim, the Defendant, and the Defendant was frighting on the victim's arms." The court of the court of the court below also stated that "A she was frighting on the victim's arms, but the victim was frighting on the victim's losses."

“A witness who is in a relatively neutral and objective position and cannot find any motive to make a false statement. As such, H’s credibility is high, H’s contents conform to the victim’s statement, ③ the above marriage ceremony is found together with the victim, and G investigation agency and the lower court.