However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 3, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Ulsan District Court on August 3, 2009 and KRW 5 million as a fine in the same court on June 4, 2015.

Although the Defendant had been punished twice due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) as above, on April 3, 2017, the Defendant driven a 90cc big dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp dyp

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on the driving of drinking, the circumstantial report and photographs of the driver;

1. Previous conviction: Inquiry about criminal history and application of a copy of a summary order;

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Article 37 (former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Social services and orders to take lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;