beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.06.27 2014고정1956

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person driving a benz car in B.

1. On February 1, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, around 15:30, operated the said vehicle at a four-lane 4-lane at the entrance of the village at the intersection from the intersection of Seocho-gu Seoul, in the direction of the entrance of the village at the intersection of the intersection, and continued to drive the said vehicle rapidly from the four-lane to the one-lane.

A driver of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle, shall not drive the motor vehicle at a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and injury on others, depending on the traffic conditions of the road and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving the motor vehicle in front and rear safe manner.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led the victim C (year 36) who was driving a one-lane due to the negligence of driving from four lanes to one-lane, and the front part of the driver’s car in the halog halog Gu car car driving by the victim C (year 36) who was driving a one-lane, to shock the back of the driver’s seat.

As a result, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, sustained fluoral salt in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim C, and at the same time suffered from the victim E (the 2-year old age), who was accompanied by the damaged vehicle, for about one week of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act by causing a traffic accident by negligence in the course of business at the time and place set forth in the above Paragraph 1. As seen above, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s property by causing the damage of KRW 13,327,200, such as replacement of the victim’s vehicle in front of the vehicle in the halog halog Gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of a traffic accident C;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2);

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Written estimate for automobile maintenance;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning records of video records in distress booms;

1. Each relevant Article of the Act concerning criminal facts;