Where the above fine is not paid, one million won shall be converted into one day.

1. Around 00:00 on September 13, 2013, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as if he did not have any intent or ability to pay alcoholic beverages, the facts in the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C, which is located in the Gu, Si, Si, Si, Gu, and Gu; and (b) ordered the victim to receive alcoholic beverages from the victim, namely, rhythm and so on at least 138,00 won at the market price.

2. At around 00:30 on the same day as indicated in paragraph (1), the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as bringing the victim’s hump, who was demanded by the said victim to pay alcoholic beverages at a large amount, and humbing glass cups on the wall.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on the occurrence of loss (Interference with business, fraud), investigation report (Attachment to field photographs);

1. Relevant Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of each fine (a point of interference with business), and the selection of each fine (a point of confession and reflection of criminal conduct, and a point of raising children aged older than older than older than older, however, the reduction is inappropriate in light of the fact that there has been no long-term same electric power, the existence of recent past past past past past past past past past past record,

1. former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;