자동차운전면허취소처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On January 17, 2018, the Plaintiff was given a mark of 15 points in violation of traffic signals.
B. On December 31, 2018, at around 08:15, the Plaintiff driven the Bi30 vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.094%, and 800 meters from the front day of the YY-gu C hotel in Ansan-si to the upper 173 upper gate of the same Gu, from the front day of the Y-gu C hotel in Ansan-si to the upper 173 upper gate, and thereafter, the Plaintiff stopped to turn to the left at the fourth way while making a left turn from the above upper gate distance.
C. The defendant received the plaintiff's above A.
It is given 15 points and 15 points due to the violation of the signal of this paragraph.
On January 10, 2019, on the ground that the driver's license was revoked for the plaintiff on January 10, 2019 on the ground that the driver's license was revoked for the first class large and first class ordinary driver's license (hereinafter "the disposition in this case") if the driver's license was added to the 1110 points due to drinking driving, etc. (100 points and 10 points of the violation of the duty of safe driving).
The Plaintiff appealed against the instant disposition and filed an administrative appeal, but the Central Administrative Appeals Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for administrative appeal on April 30, 2019.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 24, 25, Eul evidence 1 to 15, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Plaintiff saw that the Plaintiff did not have any locked for 6 hours in the car after the Plaintiff saw that the Plaintiff she had no locked with his son, and that she had no locked driving during the automobile after she got the Plaintiff’s driver’s license, that the Plaintiff did not cause any traffic accident except for this case for about nine years since she acquired the Plaintiff’s license, and that the Plaintiff was on duty in the manufacturing company of medicines located in Ansan-si, and that the Plaintiff was on duty in the production company of medicines located in Ansan-si. The Plaintiff was on duty without any public transportation means that is far away from home, and thus, it is difficult to maintain the workplace when the driver’s license is revoked.