When a credit card debt amounting to KRW 50 million, the Defendant was derived from the Defendant’s credit card debt amounting to KRW 50 million, and was returned to the Defendant’s 43,000,000,000 investment money invested in the Defendant Company B (S) who is a supply business provider, and was willing to repay the above credit card debt amount. If the Defendant cancelled the Defendant’s right to collateral security equivalent to KRW 170,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, the Defendant would receive KRW 120,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, from the loan money received after the cancellation of the said right to collateral security, the Defendant would invest more than KRW 60,000,000,000,000,000.

In other words, the victim D(62) and E(67 years old) were introduced to lend 50 million won to the victim B.

However, even if the claimant received money from the victim D and E, he did not intend to make investments in the loan with the cancellation of the right to collateral security on the said money even if he received money from the victim D and E.

Defendant D and E attempt to invest KRW 600 million in G office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F around February 10, 2015, along with the victim B who knew of the above Defendant’s intent.

First of all, it is necessary to cancel the collateral security of KRW 170,000,000,000,000,000,000.

Of KRW 170,000,000, A’s husband and wife took custody of KRW 120,000,000,000 for the cost of cancelling the right to collateral security. If A’s husband and wife borrowed KRW 50,000,00,000, it was used to terminate the collateral security established on A’s real estate, and immediately concluded that A would return money within two days with the loan of KRW 1 billion.

The Defendant, at a coffee shop in which it is impossible to know the trade name in the Yongsandong around February 12, 2015, received the victim B a total of KRW 30 million from the victim D and E, respectively, and the Defendant received the victim B a total of KRW 15 million.